GITS Script Reading & Analysis: “Bridesmaids” — Structure

Yesterday we began our analysis of the script “Bridesmaids” here. Much of the discussion was about how raw the 8/12/2009 draft was, especially in comparison to the movie.

However even in a ‘vomit draft’ like this one, essentially reflecting the writers’ attempt to put something down on paper to see where the story took them, there is a basic take on the overall story structure that not only worked, but is also pretty much present in the movie.

So once again, I ask you to consider some of these iterations of three-act structure:

Aristotle: Beginning / Middle / End

Campbell [Hero’s Journey]: Separation / Initiation / Return

Hegel: Thesis / Antithesis / Synthesis

Jung: Invitation / Immersion / Integration

Frankly I can see how each one of these idioms can work as a lens through which to interpret the three major movements of the story as articulated in the script draft we read.

Beyond that, this would be a great opportunity to explore the phenomenon known as set pieces. For background on the concept, go here. Why don’t we make a list of set pieces in the “Bridesmaids” script? If you write comedy, you should understand and embrace the idea of a set piece as it is a critical component to any script structure.

Tomorrow let’s discuss the script’s characters. We will consider five primary character archetypes: Protagonist, Nemesis, Attractor, Mentor, and Trickster. I think they each have their place with the story’s cast.

If you haven’t had the chance to read the 8/12/2009 draft of “Bridesmaids,” go here.

[Remember next week’s genre is drama. The script: Good Will Hunting.]

NOTE: THIS SERIES AND THE USE OF SCRIPTS IS STRICTLY FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES!

See you in comments to discuss structure in “Bridesmaids.”

Comment Archive